Skip to content
Dx

ICD-10-CM 2027 diagnosis code

J67Hypersensitivity pneumonitis due to organic dust

Not billable — use a more specific code

J67 is a header code, so it can't be reported by itself. Choose one of the 10 more specific codes beneath it.

Code unchanged since ICD-10-CM took effect on October 1, 2015. Source: official FY2027 ICD-10-CM release from CDC/NCHS and CMS. Page updated September 29, 2026. About our data

About J67

J67 is the ICD-10-CM diagnosis code for hypersensitivity pneumonitis due to organic dust. It belongs to block J60-J70 (lung diseases due to external agents) and chapter 10 (diseases of the respiratory system). It is a header code, so it can't be reported by itself; one of its 10 subcodes must be used instead.

To report this condition, pick the subcode that matches the documentation: J67.0 (lung), J67.1 (Bagassosis), J67.2 (lung), J67.3 (Suberosis), J67.4 (lung), J67.5 (lung), J67.6 (lung), J67.7 (lung) and 2 more.

Don't report J67 together with the conditions in its Excludes1 note: pneumonitis due to inhalation of chemicals, gases, fumes or vapors (J68.0).

It has been part of ICD-10-CM since the code set took effect on October 1, 2015 and hasn't changed since.

Specific codes under J67

Coding notes

IncludesFurther defines the content of the category
  • allergic alveolitis and pneumonitis due to inhaled organic dust and particles of fungal, actinomycetic or other origin
Excludes1Not coded here — never report together with this code
  • pneumonitis due to inhalation of chemicals, gases, fumes or vapors (J68.0)

Notes that apply from higher levels

Instructions written at a parent level also apply to J67.

Codes whose notes reference J67

Code history

  1. 2016
  2. 2017
  3. 2018
  4. 2019
  5. 2020
  6. 2021
  7. 2022
  8. 2023
  9. 2024
  10. 2025
  11. 2026
  12. 2027
  • FY2016 (effective 10/1/2015): Added (first year of ICD-10-CM)
  • No changes since FY2016.

Common questions about J67

Is J67 billable?

No. J67 is a header code. Report one of its more specific subcodes instead.